History: Just one thing after another

Anyone that knows me, knows that my studying for a degree in history is reflective of my passion for it.  My 2nd year at University was dominated by modules on the First and Second World War’s, these periods are indeed what I specialise in.  With this in mind, perhaps you may imagine that upon learning of the Prime Minster’s slip up in historical knowledge, calling Britain ‘a junior partner’ in the Second World War in 1940, would dismay me.  However, I have come to learn that people’s knowledge of British history including those major events in our country’s national psyche, are far from perfect.

In a recent pub quiz I attended, one question was exactly what Cameron was meant to be referring to,

‘In what year did the Japanese bomb Pearl Harbour?’

The answer is of course 1941, not 1940 as Mr Cameron was alluding to.   To be precise it was Sunday 7 December 1941 at 07.55 hours! – But how many people could have really told you that?  Indeed at the quiz, out of a room of 50 people, only two teams got the right answer.  I even overheard the table behind me, 5 older woman clearly state ‘oh bother I thought it was 1940’.  Mr Cameron is clearly not alone in his slip up.

What I was dismayed as were the comments banded around the BBC’s website, for example, Terry Burton the President of the Association for Veterans of Foreign Wars said that the comments would ‘alienate a lot of veterans’.  If veterans seriously believe that the younger generation know everything or anything for that matter about the actions they fought in, they are sadly wrong.

David Miliband said that Cameron’s comments were ‘misguided’.  I would like to ask Mr Miliband:

How many British soldiers were actually killed on the first day of the Somme?

When the invasion of the Soviet Union by Nazi Germany occurred?

When the first atomic bomb was dropped on Japan?

If he can’t answer these, then I too would call him misguided.

In short, it was a simple mistake and nothing more.  A mistake that I am sure, millions in this country would also make.


BUCF President


5 thoughts on “History: Just one thing after another

  1. Obviously “sole partner” in 1940 but certainly junior partner after German invasion of Soviet Union

  2. Exactly Max. Very much the junior partner, but there is often a longing by the British people to hold onto that sense of the 2WW being our war.

  3. I’m not sure those questions are quite as significant as getting the year of the US’s entry into ww2 right.

    I should also point out that if David Miliband was unable to answer those questions he would at least research the information before bringing it into an interview.

  4. That’s very nice but my post actually implied the same thing but suggested that some facts were worth knowing more than others. In any case it doesn’t change what I said about Cameron doing his research.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s