Labour Has Failed (Part 1)

Death of New Labour?

Labour has failed. They have sunk into the black hole of the political world, and all attempts at clawing their way out have met with public exasperation. The government’s record on poverty, social mobility, education, health, defence, and the economy has been demolished and the bare bones of New Labour are now evident. Let me divulge:

Poverty: By May of this year, ministers were forced to admit that they had all but abandoned Labour’s “historic” and headline grabbing promise to halve child poverty by next year. This admission came as the official, yet still possibly doctored figures revealed that the number of people in Britain living in poverty had risen to 11 million; a rise of almost 300,000 since 2006. The figures painted a bleak picture. In the Independent, Theresa May, the shadow Work and Pensions Secretary, said the promise to halve child poverty was one of many Mr Brown had failed to deliver. “It is a tragedy that the number of children falling into the poverty cycle is continuing to rise,” she said. “The Government needs to wake up and get a grip of this problem. We must tackle the root causes of poverty, such as educational failure, family breakdown, drug abuse, indebtedness and crime.” This the government has not done.

Social Mobility: Even with initiatives such as a two grade advantage for poorer children in exams and one of the biggest rises in state welfare this country has seen, social mobility has decreased. The ease by which children and adults can move to a higher pay grade has declined, and in fact, unemployment is now higher than it was during any time in the 1990s. The Times reports that; in 1999 Tony Blair told the Labour Conference: “If we are in politics for one thing, it is to make sure that all children are given the best chance in life.” A decade on, the Government has had to admit that billions of pounds of investment in nurseries and schools and on training has failed to bridge the class divide, and that social mobility in Britain has stalled.

Jeff Randall’s article in the Telegraph in July summed up Labour’s social mobility failure: “No matter which way progressive educationalists spin it, the horror before them is unavoidable. Despite abolishing grammar schools, dumbing down GCSEs and A-levels (to create the illusion of rising standards in state schools)…bullying our best universities into accepting state-school students with below-par grades, social mobility is in retreat.”

Education: Where to start! In 1997 we heard the now cliché line; “education, education, education!” Many thought that the new Labour Party would look after and strengthen the British education system. How wrong they were. Labour introduced numeracy and literacy hours in order to reduce the decline in primary school maths and English levels. Teachers attacked the policy, head-teachers belittled it and the public knew better than to think it would be a success. All were right. This year, Labour finally admitted that its extremely centralised control of schools does not work.

Now, as the Guardian reports; one by one, the totems of Labour’s disastrous education policies are being dismantled. Jenni Russell in a Guardian article in June states that Labour’s education department, with its centralising and controlling instincts would have been applauded in a soviet state!

There is no doubt that the government has poured money into education. Billions of extra pounds have been diverted from the economy to boost standards and improve the flagging education system. Yet it has done nothing. The government has had no clear strategy on how to spend it, and on where to use it, thus it has had no impact. Moreover, we hear this week that the number of NEETS (those not in Education, Employment, or Training) has increased greatly. Now more teenagers are dropping out of school or college without a job then when Labour came to power. Now nearly 1 in 10, 16-18 year olds are classified as NEETS.

Now as Labour try to grab more headlines with new education policy, Michael Gove, the Conservative education spokesman, points out that they are a “combination of unfunded commitments, re-announcements, and policies that aren’t even supported by their own Ministers.”

To be continued…

Daniel Cole

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Labour Has Failed (Part 1)

  1. All valid, but would the Conservatives sort out immigration, just like we UKIPpers? If so, then they are the party of choice….

  2. Great blog Dan, many good points made

    The only thing that gets me is the quote on how GCSEs and A Levels have been dumbed down.

    Personally I feel that A levels which ever school you go to are challenging and that those who put in the work reap the benefits, I know for my A levels I tried my little backside off and it annoys me when people say they are easier.

    I agree that in some subjects which are seen as ‘lesser’ subjects such as those as media studies maybe are easier to pass, however these subjects are frowned upon by decent universities and are usually not counted.

    I think that in true Conservative philosophy, a bit of competition is a good thing, yes people may have been disappointed, especially in the recent a level results and some not gaining university places, however everyone already at university worked their hardest to get there, so why cant others (I accept some have worse circumstances than others but as I always say, work hard and you will reap the benefits, me being controversial as always)

  3. “I know for my A levels I tried my little backside off and it annoys me when people say they are easier”

    It may annoy you, but it’s hardly an argument. Maybe you should try to evaluate the issue objectively instead.

      • That’s possible, but colleges don’t nessecarily want the easiest papers as the easier ones won’t be as respected by universities and such. Obviously, there’s more to higher pass rates than easier exams.

        Anyway, how do you know the difficulty of the older exams was correct in the first place?
        Also, there is some value in subjectivity: he’s experienced something directly – you haven’t, don’t dismiss that.

        When you think of it, if you did make exams more difficult people would just complain about lower pass rates. You just can’t win, can you?

  4. I think A levels are tough too. But the statistics would show that they have become easier than they were say 10 years ago

  5. I think that the privatisation of the exam boards was a mistake. Companies now compete for school contracts, and so it’s possible that they make their papers easier to gain a competitive edge over their rivals.

    I think the first thing I would do is have A-levels set by one education authority.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s