The Politics of Hate

Call me naive, but I believe that most people join political parties to serve the greater good. So imagine joining a party and then to be told or have it implied that membership of that group involves hatred of another group – some of whom you count amongst your friends. A former Labour councillor – who happens to be a friend of mine – is struggling with this conundrum – she doesn’t think that being a Labour supporter means you have to hate the evil Tories.

It doesn’t take much digging around to illuminate the fact that the “All Tories are evil” mantra is more than an isolated position from the governing party. Even if you can ignore the fact that Labour has enacted legislation that means that asserting similar generalisations about other groups could land you in prison or that the observation that stoking pathologies is ethically despicable, I think that in the UK this Mugabe-esque strategy is political suicide.

Even if a substantial number of ‘natural’ supporters sign up to the philosophy of hate and all it implies (and given that people tend to base their opinions on their own, this is a big if) to the floating voter this strategy smacks of an organisation that has given up trying to win the intellectual argument. The effectiveness of Labour’s Crewe & Nantwich campaign was a case in point.

From the Tory point of view, Labour’s strategy has plenty of spin-off benefits. Paranoid Labourites attacking each other for not displaying sufficient loyalty or engaging in pointless witch-hunts must be helping the wider Conservative cause. For the record, I hate what Labour have done to this country and am astonished at the residual support for Labour, but Tories won’t succeed by sinking to Labour’s level and allowing ‘hate campaigns’ to be part of mainstream political discourse. Please join me on the unite against hate campaigns group on facebook.

1 thought on “The Politics of Hate

  1. I think your completely correct. When I joined UCL I was surprised firstly by the number of Conservatives at the “liberal” university, and also by the extensive “hate the evil Tories” mentality of some of the rest of the student body. But as for the image you display, that comes from what I see as being a mistake made during the last general election; the “dog whistle” policies with regards to immigration, which made some people sit up and listen, and others walk away in distaste. I believe in a sensible immigration policy, but some of the messages during the last election campaign did help to turn off urban voters, especially those in ethnic minorities. Hence the image you display. It wasn’t merely a popular reaction against the policies, but also an intellectual one, and it made the Conservative party look out of touch, and potentially, racist.

    I believe this is something we should not repeat in the next general election. And its not so much a matter of “appeasing” migrants in any way shape or form, but it is important we realise that terms such as “ethnic minorities” are becoming irrelevant, especially when we remember that in some parts of the UK, white people (which we traditionally think of as descending from our “Anglo-Saxon heritage’) are in the minority. We need a responsible immigration policy, not one which could in any way be interpreted, however incorrectly, as being racist. Then we may not get reactions described above.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s