Local View: New Street – The ditherers come good at last.

For those outside the West Midlands the government’s announcement to give £400 million of the £600 million redevelopment of Birmingham New Street may have come across as a rather nice thing for the government to do. The real story of the gruelling campaign to get this government to make a decision, any decision, has been hidden to all but those who have been following the story.

It is often said the campaign to get New Street redeveloped has been going on for 20 years. But the current campaign kicked of in mid 2004 when the City threw out the incompetent Labour led council.

The Birmingham Post reports that the plans submitted by the Conservative led coalition had a cost-benefit of ‘£4 of economic benefit for every £1 of public money spent’. This apparently is a ratio far in excess of most Government projects, which gives you an idea of the Labour mindset and an insight of how this government manages to misspend £101 billion of your money every year…

Instead of a yes we got years off dithering and indecision. I think that Chris Grayling said it best when he said “New Street is possibly the worst example of the Department for Transport’s pathological inability to make a decision and follow it up.”

Yet I think that the case for redevelopment is not just one about money. When New Street was opened in 1854 it was seen as an architectural marvel with the largest glass and steel roof in the world. This city now deserves to have a transport link that is worthy of its second city status. Unfortunately Brummies have never had much of a sense of theatre and it was left to the current administration to persevere with their vision, not just with New Street but the whole city master plan,

I think that the resulting go-a-head from the government was driven along with the kind of momentum that you can only really get with a Conservative led leadership such as Mike Whitby. When the government quibbled the amount it would cost the City Council went and found more private backers. At every point they eroded the government’s case for dithering.

And this brings me to my central point. There is a vast difference with what a Labour administration and a Conservative one can do for one very fundamental reason. Their frugal world is ruled not by a vision of what could be but by what we can get by with. It is the banal utilitarianism that underpins Labour thinking that means that they will always fall short on the big projects, the big plans. They built the NHS sure, but as a testament to how unsuccessful that money burning leviathan has been it has never been copied by any other country in the world.

Despite over a decade in office the Labour party is still slightly scared of showboating, wary of a bit of grandeur. They might have dropped the red banner at party conferences but behind it all is that ideological barrier to the power of self worth. They underestimate what something as simple as a world class train station can do for the city’s morale. I guess it makes sense when your last big outing was the Millennium Dome.

Birmingham is moving forward under this administration because man is still inspired by a vision, and what is more so is business. When a project aims further than mere necessity, when it becomes a statement of intent for the future the money men start to listen and any risk of loss is transferred partly onto them. For this risk they are rightly handsomely rewarded.

This result is a tribute to the city’s leadership and perseverance and a reminder of what we could achieve if we get rid of the dithering, intellectually spent, nervy leadership that unfortunately still seems to ‘run’ the country.

Advertisements

9 thoughts on “Local View: New Street – The ditherers come good at last.

  1. New Street currently puts the “ming” in Birmingham. Thus I am delighted that the redevelopment plans are going ahead… coming from a family of builders, civil engineers and architechts I have kept a close eye on the redevelopment plans, not just for New St but for Birmingham in general, and I too have been incredibly frustrated by the governments dithering.

    The Re-New Street project will provide Birmingham with an economic boom. This council are making huge strides in the re-development of Birmingham. After 20 years of Labour domination and inaction Birmingham is looking and feeling like a “second city” and is definately the one to watch.

  2. I think it is Jeremy Clarkson who one said we should just have a pot of money for really cool big cultural things (probably not a direct quote)

    I think hes spot on, politicians should do things once in a while to make people feel good about themselves.

    London 2012 prime example we are building a temporary satdium . . .

  3. Dithering? Oh please – you need to learn that it’s not very wise in politics to advertise your own achilles heel by pretending your opponent has one.

    Do a quick google search on “Whitby” and “Dithering” and tell me what you come up with. I’m guessing it will have something to do with the new library or the elected mayor, or one of his other famous exploits of indecision.

    People in glass houses don’t throw stones – especially not at brick houses.

  4. I am sure some developments were made over 20 years… but not to the same degree… and not worthy of a second city. Birmingham has been for years regarded as a dingy city… one you pass through. That is changing as new developments emmerge and old stereotypes prove to be ill founded. New Street will be a shining example of Birminghams progression in to a vibrant modern city and cement an economic boom.

  5. Of the top of my head I can’t think of any? And also one would expect any administration to build at least something in 20 years. This decision has been conceived, planned, costed, and delivered in less than 4 years under a Conservative led Council.

    Also we have to be aware that something’s are driven from Whitehall and others nearer the ground. I think this New Street decision was definitely the latter. What wasn’t in the blog is just how sceptical and uncooperative the Government were towards the project.

  6. I would have thought the council were involved somewhat in Brindley Place, the Mailbox, The Bull Ring, the redevelopment of the various squares in the city centre. In fact I think the NEC group, which comprises the NEC, the NEC arena and the ICC, and which arguably kick-started Birmingham’s regeneration, was conceived and driven by a Labour council.

    Though we can be pleased with the continued progress.

  7. Dan, in the interest of balance, it should be recognised that much of Birmingham’s revival has taken place over the last 20 years, not just the last four.

  8. John to be fair I think it’s widely accepted that regarding this New Street Gateway project it’s Whitby’s presence that has driven it forward. Though I do accept that he has his detractors – Paul Dale of the Birmingham Post is particularly scornful! Though i hear that this is a long running personal thing. If your Google searches return anything from him a prudent student would bear this enmity in mind.

    History students I believe have a saying relating to bias – ‘if you want to know your history, then you first need to know your historians’ – same here I think.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s